Dolly Please don’t write like this just because you can

Don’t get me wrong- I love Dolly Parton. And I’m pretty okay with James Patterson. But put them together and they make the worst opening sentence to a novel I have ever read

The Louis Seize-style mirror in the bedroom of suite 409 at the Aquitaine Hotel reflected for little more than an instant a slim, fine-featured woman: wide blue eyes, clenched fists, dark hair streaming behind her as she ran

To what serves mortal beauty?

I’ve not been able to run recently and I’ve been practicing the keyboard instead. I hadn’t heard of Despacito until an hour ago, when it had 8 billion views on Youtube. It now has 8,000,000,001 views and I have a new favourite song. And I need dance lessons because I can play dominos already (thank goodness!)

And, I say this modestly, I got the three star maximum for my playing, though the app also tells me I was in time for just 75 per cent of the song

Despacito is the perfect and complete answer to the question Hopkins raised and I used as the title

Right ho, jeeves

The adjective mozartian when used in a literary sense means something like 'This is really good and perfectly constructed but I'm worried that it's not serious enough to be great art'.  It can be used of Midsummer Night's Dream but as far as I know no-one has ever said of Hamlet, though of course some might argue that this has something to do with Hamlet's plot.

I wanted to reclaim Jeeves from this ghetto and I considered a number of ways of doing it.  I planned a piece placing him in the tradition of the Clever Servant- back through Figaro and Sancho Panza to Plautus and Menander.  If I could have found the the Old Attic font on the Squarespace word processor I'd have done it too, complete with transliterations and pic of a Gk pot from the Louvre.

I decided instead to analyze Bertie as a representative of a New Comedy.  Whereas Shakespeare typically ends his comedies with marriage and a hymeneal dance, Bertie remains ecstatically and subversively celibate.  This, I argue, shows Wodehouse as a subtle social commentator prefiguring the anomie of postmodern man and the disintegration of the family.  


For a psychologist it is significant that Bertie seems to be an orphan.  Jeeves is a surrogate father.  This is an ironic replay of the Cronos myth- Bertie is a young Zeus subjugating is own father.  Wodehouse has divided Bertie's surrogate mothers into the evil Aunt Agatha (who, as is widely known, eats broken glass) and the genial but not nurturing Aunt Dahlia (who confuses affection with Anatole's cooking)  It is only after such an analysis that we can understand the true bitterness and despair that underlies a typical utterance of our tragicomic hero- ''Toodle pip,' I said, and I meant it to sting.'  (my italics)

Then I thought about an socialist interpretation- Jeeves as the proletarian bearing the weight of rentiers and landed gentry and overweening capitalists.  Jeeves's fine intelligence is at the service of the ruling classes.  He enables them to maintain a facade of civilisation as their emotional illiteracy threatens to destroy the class solidarity they need to continue their parasitic existence.  From this beginning we can pursue an orthodox route and see Jeeves as a class traitor- the foreman or kulak the bosses have always needed as their 'interface' (if one may borrow a term from computer science) with the labouring masses.  I prefer however to adopt an alternative line and see Jeeves as a proletarian protohero- he has seen and understood his power and is at the threshold of a socialist consciousness which will enable society to evolve.  This approach has two advantages- firstly it is easier to support from the text ('Mentally, of course, Mr Wooster is negligible' as Jeeves observes) and secondly it does not require me to ban the books and send the author for re-education as would be the case if a class traitor were the hero.


Yet again, as Bertie spends a lot of time in New York (though not, as it happens, in this novel) I could be purely literary and compare Jeeves and The Great Gatsby.  This would have the not insignificant advantage of finally destroying whatever remains of Fitzgerald's reputation.  Wodehouse does not have Fitzgerald's persistent whineyness.  He does not share Fitzgerald's obsession with money.  And his narrator, Bertie, is far more of an agent in his own life than Nick Carraway in Gatsby.  


Or I shall emphasise the elegiac nature of the books.  Here I shall adopt a symbolic approach.  Gussie Fink-Nottle's strong fixation for the aquatic members of the family salamandridae would form one of the legs of my argument.  It is too superficial to think that Gussie is into newts because he is uncomfortable in society.  Indeed the fact that this is suggested by 'mentally negligible' Bertie should be enough to alert us to the inexactitude of this interpretation.  Gussie likes newts because he is hankering for a gentler kinder England that is passing under tarmacadam.  The silver cow creamer that drives the plot of so many of the novels in the series is another important symbol.  It brings us back to basics- the novels were written (some of them) at a time when Churchill was struggling to bring Britain back to the silver standard after WW1 and carries therefore a multiplicity of meanings.  It represents monetary value, but also the sterling values of Edwardian society.  Further it represents a cow, and therefore the roast beef of old England.  It contains cream- a sensory memory of our mother's milk and a connection to mother earth and our motherland.  Possession of this object therefore, though presented as a farcical attempt by Bertie to purloin it on behalf of a woman is in fact symbolic of possession of the soul of England.  It is as important as Excalibur in another myth cycle.


I could.  But I prefer to rehabilitate mozartian.  There is nothing wrong with perfection.  The plots of Jeeves stories are constructed and executed as perfectly as anything else I have read.  And Wodehouse is one of the finest prose stylists in English- with a taste as distinctive as violet cachou.  No one else could have written 'as foul a pessimist as ever bit a tiger' which is one of my favourite lines in all literature and even funnier in context.

Uncle Toby

Uncle Toby’s bowling green

Uncle Toby’s bowling green

Uncle Toby’s hobby horse (his dada) was the re-enactment of the Siege of Namur where he received the wound to his groin. Sterne tells us he used the Shandy Hall bowling green to do this. The bowling green looked like this a couple of years ago

coxwold garden.jpg

I never quite understood why such a gentle man would spend so much time blowing up his brother’s back garden, but on Sunday I went to the Invalides (the military museum in Paris) It has a couple of rooms full of miniature cannon and toy soldiers. The labels tell me, rather didactically that the cannon are not toys. They are scale models or prestige gifts for nobilility.

Maybe. But if had some of these (and a garden) I’d be shooting them until the gendarmerie took me away.

DSC_0003.JPG

The toy soldiers are just toys, or, if they were mine- cannon fodder!

toy soldiers.JPG

Uncle Toby’s battlefield can be seen at Laurence Sterne’s house my favourite of all the writer’s houses I’ve visited

Beat Generation

A Beat Generation exhibition is coming to its end at the Pompidou Centre.  It's good looking and witty.  I especially liked the row of Bakelite telephones looking like the hotel lobby in a Hitchcock film, waiting for Cary Grant to make a call to his pneumatic blonde.  Call any number, said the caption, to hear a Beat poem.

I didn't dial.  The risk was simply too great that I'd hear an Allen Ginsberg poem.  And Ginsberg is a grift perpetrated by the US literary-industrial complex.  Translated to France, but not French, it looks like this